Guilty as Sock!

It's a good game, the courtrooms are awesome, but the one thing that is terrible, is the people that play it. This is most definitely a game to play with your friends and not in a public lobby.

[h2]About The Game[/h2] Guilty As Sock is a mock trial improv game for 3-9 of your favored [strike]enemies[/strike] friends where you get the power to put anyone and anything on trial for any reason you can invent. Depending on the number of players and how serious you want to play, cases can take anywhere between 5 and 50 minutes to complete. I should note here at the beginning that this game isn't like most other games you'll find on Steam - it's more of an improv comedy tool than it is a "game" with winners and losers. Because of that, you need to approach it slightly differently and be ready to be challenged in a few areas. When played well, this is a game where everyone wins, because no one will be able to breathe over all of the laughter. When played poorly, this game will always fall flat and feel like the worst experience ever. You need to bring your A game to something like this for it to work - commit to the bit. [h2]Positives[/h2] [list] [*][b]Its Phoenix Wright: Unhinged[/b] - And that's great. [*][b]Goes beyond basic roles[/b] - While the Judge, Lawyers, and Jury are great roles, they're also the default for a game like this. The Witness, Bailiff, and Reporter roles really help level this game up into something unique. This is especially true for the Reporter, which looks like a throwaway role at first until you realize it's the only role with the ability to interrupt the game with a unique interstitial, line of text, and poorly drawn image. Using that at the right time can truly elevate a scene into something that leaves everyone wheezing or screaming. [*][b]Understands improv requires body language and movement[/b] - The emotes, voice chat, camera motion, and visual tools all lend themselves well to enhancing the scene. While beginning players may rely on reactions from the emote wheel, advanced players can weave emotes pretty easily into their speeches using hotkeys. [*][b]Customized Cards[/b] - Surprised to see this so early, but very appreciative of it. While the default evidence cards are fun, customized evidence is way better because it provides a continually changing pool of topics and toss-ups that keep scenes fresh. [*][b]Variety of cosmetic slots & scenes[/b] - There are a number of areas of the puppet that can be customized and there is already a fair number of options, but this will continue to get better as things roll forward, and there's already a number of fun options to use. Even smaller options, like the ability to choose a face/icon for the defendant, adds to the unexpected. [/list] [h2]Negatives (which may change)[/h2] [list] [*][b]Moderate to high improv difficulty[/b] - GaS is a improv game that doesn't have the time to teach you improv, unfortunately. As someone who's done improv for 20 years, it's a skill you learn and advance over time and you will probably suck at it the first time you try. If you're not comfortable making stuff up on the fly, being silly in front of friends, or going all in, then you will have a hard time with this game. Improv requires you to lean in to a scene and this game is no different. [*][b]Requires large party[/b] - At base, you'll need at least 3-4 friends to get this game to operate. The more the better, as folks can rotate roles and try new things that honestly add a lot of fun to the game. [*][b]No formal rules or format[/b] - I'm putting this in the negatives because I know it's driving other people's negative reviews, but this is honestly a hard call. As someone with a background in improv, I love that Guilty As Sock lets me run the show and doesn't force me into a pre-determined format or time limits. That lets me react and change up my formatting as the judge/showrunner on the fly to follow the fun, which is AWESOME. However, for other people, having no rules is horrifying and difficult to overcome, because it leaves a lot of things very vague. Having a newbie friendly trial mode and the option with a "no rules mode" trial could be a potential solution here. That way new players aren't left in the dark while advanced players still have open reign to do as they please. [*][b]Requires basic legal knowledge[/b] - You don't have to pass a Bar exam, but you should know the general flow of a trial and have a few episodes of Law & Order in your head. Otherwise, some of the game's tools can get lost, like the judge's ability to discard evidence after an objection or calling witnesses and conducting a cross-examination. [*][b]Statistics & Achievements are just hard for this[/b] - While the dev team is clearly trying to make this work, it's just not an easy process. While some of the post-trial stats are funny, a lot of them just don't land because they rely on things like muting, or being rowdy, or vague actions folks forgot about. They're statistics without a lot of true meaning to the case or comedy. Achievements have a tendency to fall into the same trap, though some of these are more successful than others. While an achievement to bonk someone 250 times is fine, an achievement for prosecuting or defending an entire case without evidence cards is actually pretty cool, fun, and difficult to pull of if your group is playing normally. But, these systems seem to have a tendency to miss more than they have a tendency to hit. [/list]

I enjoy the premise but totally agree with what most people are saying. The cards system is restrictive and non-sensical. The real potential comes out if you have good cards and are able to create an absurd narrative. However the cards generally favour the prosecutor. In my opinion, remove the cards and have people create their own evidence as they go along. That would mean unlimited options and a constant one-upping of each other. This will make the game timeless and fully adapt to the humour of the group rather than cards the devs thought were funny.

I like the concept, but it feels like they forgot to put the game in. There are no objectives just a start and a finish. No prompts for the jury nothing to do as the reporter, or security besides colour and mess with people. Great game for an improv exercise, but, it feels empty otherwise.

the premise is great and most of the people are great the only complaint is a small group of players who are racist homophobic or other bad things. over all, the game is a great experience with randoms and friends

This isn't a game. It's a pie with no filling. It is the sea of thieves of party games. It's just streamer bait.

This game is only good if your friends are funny, but god, this game is hilarious with my group.

---{ Graphics }--- ☐ You forget what reality is ☐ Beautiful ☐ Good ☑ Decent ☐ Bad ☐ Don‘t look too long at it ☐ MS-DOS ---{ Gameplay }--- ☐ Very good ☐ Good ☑ It's just gameplay ☐ Mehh ☐ Watch paint dry instead ☐ Just don't ---{ Audio }--- ☑ Eargasm ☐ Very good ☐ Good ☐ Not too bad ☐ Bad ☐ I'm now deaf ---{ Audience }--- ☐ Kids ☑ Teens ☑ Adults ☐ Grandma ---{ PC Requirements }--- ☑ Check if you can run paint ☐ Potato ☐ Decent ☐ Fast ☐ Rich boi ☐ Ask NASA if they have a spare computer ---{ Difficulty }--- ☐ Just press 'W' ☑ Easy ☐ Easy to learn / Hard to master ☐ Significant brain usage ☐ Difficult ☐ Dark Souls ---{ Grind }--- ☑ Nothing to grind ☐ Only if u care about leaderboards/ranks ☐ Isn't necessary to progress ☐ Average grind level ☐ Too much grind ☐ You'll need a second life for grinding ---{ Story }--- ☑ No Story ☐ Some lore ☐ Average ☐ Good ☐ Lovely ☐ It'll replace your life ---{ Game Time }--- ☐ Long enough for a cup of coffee ☐ Short ☑ Average ☐ Long ☐ To infinity and beyond ---{ Price }--- ☐ It's free! ☑ Worth the price ☐ If it's on sale ☐ If u have some spare money left ☐ Not recommended ☐ You could also just burn your money ---{ Bugs }--- ☑ Never heard of ☐ Minor bugs (early access) ☐ Can get annoying ☐ ARK: Survival Evolved ☐ The game itself is a big terrarium for bugs ---{ ? / 10 }--- ☐ 1 ☐ 2 ☐ 3 ☐ 4 ☐ 5 ☐ 6 ☑ 7 ☐ 8 ☐ 9 ☐ 10

entirely dependent on how funny your friends are. The game doesn't really add onto the experience in any meaningful way. You could just do lawyer rp in a voice chat and have about as much fun. The game kinda hinders its own fun in some ways too. If you're not judge prosecutor or defense you're going to be doing nothing half the time. It's baffling to me that the convict is an npc and not a player role. Final thing: in the character customization menu there's a check box to show the judge outfit. Clicking this opens another checkbox. That checkbox actually shows the judge outfit. This really bothers me.

Great game for accusing your friends of the most heinous stuff ever thought of

7/10 alone 10/10 with friends randoms can be great or terrible, just try to get someone who doesnt say slurs or make a hitler related prompt. Super fun I do recommend

Please do so you can import files INTO a deck, anyways very fun game cheers mate

My first time playing i had fun but every other game after that i have just been called a stupid bitch or an racial slure. So its fun if you have people who you can play with consistently but other than that. just expect a shit ton of toxic little dick men trying to play with their ego dick to make them feel better about having a shrimp in their pants.

AMAZING, super fun I just love it. I love being journalist and writing adds for the Chinese communist party lol🇨🇳

Theres honestly no reason to replay the game after like a day, theres not a lot of content in the game and its entirely dependent on if you and your friends feel like doing improv for a few hours and chances are they would rather play something else. Its a weird party game because too little friends and theres not enough people to play, too many friends and the majority will get bored because only 4 roles actually can do something meaningful.

Wanted to like this game as the concept is funny and it showed promise. However, that is only if you are the Judge, Prosecutor or Defense as its really just a three player game with a fancy mostly unneeded or uninvolved audience. So for everyone else its essentially a paper airplane simulator (for which some dude playing the Judge will silence you for anyways). Basically its like Toast Masters using sock puppets on meth. The roles are broken down into several different positions within this made up trial. Judge: (required) is supposed to control the flow of the game. Usually some fucking 5' 4" douche bag with a god complex. Prosecutor: (required) decides the charges which are almost always about 9-11, Epstein or on some racist shit. Oh, and they are also supposed to argue the case. Usually the douche bags friend. Defense: (required) obvious, defends the case. Witness: acts as the witness for both Prosecution/Defense. Reporter: has the ability to sway the case with Breaking News. Simply put another way to introduce evidence/alibis. Bailiff: controls the courtroom (not really tho). Juror: in theory has the ability to sway a case by using a whiteboard to draw notes visible to the courtroom, is supposed to decide a trial (yet to actually see this). The biggest flaw of this game; too many non-participants. Most people saw this game on YT or Twitch and think it would be fun to play. Which it would, but it does require some originality as this game does not play itself like most people expect. You have to be able to think quick on the fly and have the ability to respond just as fast. And as people want to be entertained it is expected to be funny. Firstly, it can be hard finding games where the 3 needed roles are filled as you'll have lobbies full of people sitting on the Jury. It seems most of the people "playing" this are Jurors because they know they are either not capable of actual role-playing the required positions leaving no purpose other than disrupt out of sheer boredom (hence paper airplane simulator). You would think this would actually make it easier finding a game, well wrong. A large amount of the lobbies are filled with children and when you finally do get a full panel it presents another issue. Its almost a guarantee that the Judge never actually consults the Jury, or utilizes their Bailiff properly. Instead tending to those roles on their own (e.g actually silencing the Bailiff who is trying to do their job). This is why its essentially a three player game. A simple way to fix some of these issues is to remove some of the power from the Judge and force the use of the Jury and Bailiff. Especially the Jury. Somehow, I've yet to see one trial where the Jury was actually used to decide the trial. The only other position I feel that can make an actual impact on a trial is the Reporter. And they are usually the funniest part of the trial. However, this individual must be creative and this is unfortunately less common so be prepared to see a lot of dick pictures with little to no actual context. The other job which requires a high amount of improv is the Witness. However, by design this person plays both sides and can be amusing if you have the right person playing it. Often it just presents the problem when people play in a group. They'll biasedly lead to one side vs. another just to have their friend win. Not that there is a rating that implies this is a mature game. But, there are also too many kids playing this game. This is annoying as you have lobby after lobby filled with screamers demanding to be a certain position, allowing them to be that position and then totally ruining it for everyone else because they have no fucking clue what they are doing. Also you can only hear no cap/bussin/simp or whatever so many times before you want to stab a pencil in your ear to make it stop. Additionally, evidence cards are few and few between. There's only like 20 or whatever and they recycle over and over. As they are not in the spirit of Cards Against Humanity they can be extremely hard to prosecute/defend as you can only use an unused ticket stub or stuck chewing gum so many times. You'll hear "these cards are terrible" as a defense ore than once. You can make your own evidence cards, but again there are loads of kids that play this game and the ones I've come across so far have been anything but PG so you're bound to get a game night 50yo mom of three tossing back a half bag of Franzia "there are kids here" comment. The recent update also allows kicking people and has made this game more lame as its now being abused. Not getting kicked because they are annoying, but because they are not good at improvisation. So get ready to sit through a whole game listening to some dude yelling nothing but N*bombs like its a COD lobby, but dudes who are actually trying but just sucks at the game will get booted in a heartbeat. Oh, and you'll also likely get kicked for using functions in the game, like drawings or notes, throwing paper or turning dudes into chickens. Although funny at times, so far I have enjoyed maybe 1:4 trials. The others were just another avenue for 16 year olds to release their inner racists, people playing Judges exhibiting narcissistic tendencies (just like in real life), or some kid chewing with his dog barking in the back while he'd devouring a bag of Doritos and jamming out to some bullshit. Nice try lawyer Diddy!

Fun game to play with others, or join public lobbies! Highly recommend

sentenced my son to eternal life in the electric chair once. 10/10 and right as i suggest adding the ability to name lobbies they do something even better the literal next day of making the review. tags! with an 18+ tag!

Your experience will depend greatly on who you play with. The game itself is fun, but pretty much only facilitates you picking your role in the court room. Literally everything else is in the hands of how funny your friends are and how serious they are taking it. Mileage may vary.

there's barely a game here. this is basically an avatar system strapped to a VOIP client and a deck of cards. If this game seems fun to you, you'd have more fun just doing improv/debate/theater with your friends in a discord call.

Guilty as Sock! is an eccentric, improvisation-driven party game that turns the courtroom into a full-blown comedic stage, where sock puppets play judge, jury, and wildly unqualified legal professionals. Developed by Demon Max and released in 2025, the game trades logic and order for chaos and absurdity, crafting a multiplayer experience that thrives on storytelling, social interaction, and sheer unpredictability. With roles for up to nine players—including judge, defense attorney, prosecutor, bailiff, journalist, witness, and jurors—every session becomes a loosely structured, hysterical trial full of wild accusations, ridiculous evidence, and over-the-top drama. At the heart of the game is the accusation. The prosecutor invents an absurd crime—anything from “smuggling haunted cheese” to “tampering with a time machine”—which the defense must rebut using a hand of equally ridiculous evidence cards. Players select from these pre-written prompts to craft their arguments, building a case that is less about logic and more about who can sell the silliest or most convincing narrative. The evidence cards range from bizarre to surreal and are the engine of the game’s improvisational comedy, sparking spontaneous storytelling that keeps everyone laughing and on edge. Gameplay is segmented but free-form. The judge calls on players to speak, bang their gavel for order (or chaos), and essentially steer the energy of the trial. The bailiff can enforce or disrupt the flow, while journalists throw in fictional headlines that shape public opinion and keep things unpredictable. Witnesses are wildcards—sometimes helpful, sometimes completely unhinged—and jurors must ultimately vote on the defendant's guilt, based on little more than which side entertained or convinced them more. There’s no objective truth here; the game is built on collective storytelling, where the outcome is often less important than the absurd journey that got you there. One of the game’s strengths is how dynamic and inclusive it feels. Whether players are seasoned improv performers or just trying to break the ice at a party, Guilty as Sock! creates a space where everyone can contribute something. Its flexible design allows for different group sizes and personalities. Shy players might prefer roles like juror or journalist, while those who love the spotlight can dive into the roles of prosecutor or judge. Voice chat plays a huge role, making it ideal for game nights, online streaming, or chaotic group calls. Visually, the game keeps things simple. The aesthetic is intentionally lo-fi and puppet-like, emphasizing personality through voice acting and imagination rather than flashy graphics. What matters most is how players embody their roles and bounce off one another. The user interface is intuitive, and the game gives just enough structure—timers, turns, and prompts—to guide the mayhem without stifling creativity. Over time, as players learn how evidence cards interact and which roles suit them best, the chaos becomes more manageable and even strategic. That said, Guilty as Sock! isn’t for every group. Players looking for serious competition, balance, or clearly defined win conditions may find it lacking. The rules are intentionally loose, and the experience leans more on performance and improvisation than strategy. It’s a social sandbox designed for shared laughter rather than leaderboard glory. And like many party games, it lives or dies based on the energy and creativity of the group playing it. Overall, Guilty as Sock! is a hilariously offbeat addition to the party game genre. It excels as a group activity that values imagination, spontaneity, and collaboration over mechanics or polish. The courtroom framing gives it a quirky edge, and the mix of structured roles and absurd freedom makes each session feel unique. It’s not about winning—it’s about how convincingly (or ridiculously) you can defend your sock from allegations of intergalactic pizza theft. For players who love improv, social storytelling, or simply want to experience the kind of game where your puppet is accused of crimes against breakfast, Guilty as Sock! is guilty—of being ridiculously fun. Rating: 8/10

there's no actual gameplay and it's all reliant on how good your friend group is on improv. the presentation is good but the basic concept could be accomplished just as well in a discord call with microsoft paint if you're that committed.

Such a fun game. the game really depends on the group that you can find or muster up and how far you are willing to get into it. I would say that the default evidence is kinda boring but luckily you can customize the evidence cards and that is when i think the game can be its best and it is just so fun. Only issue is that i feel like the game really needs everyone to be into it and there is just a need for to much people. Some of the roles also kind of suck as they don't really do much but i guess that's just the way of things. Would recomend for a game night with friends. 8.5/10

its fun with friends otherwise it can be pretty boring as the game is somewhat lacking on actual content and mainly relies on the idea that you create the fun yourself with your friends. i do really wish there was a little more game play elements because currently the game feels really basic and lacking but it seems like a very solid start for a good game to play with friends. most public lobbies suck.

Need to change the bailiff to another witness as having one person play both witnesses is biased, would make the game perfect, apart from that decent

This game is hilarious. I love being a judge and confiscating a laptop full of erotic squirrel photos for further investigations and letting the accused go scott-free. My only critique is that this game is very open ended and relies on strong improv skills. Due to that, a single court case can easily reach 30 minutes or longer with people trying to riff and stumble upon a good jok- I mean... defense. A possible aid is having some mock trial guide on the order of events (opening statements, evidence, witnesses, etc) so that there is some direction and helps people know where they are at in a case and what to prepare for next. Otherwise, don't take it seriously, just have fun with it. for $5.50, hard to go wrong if you can convince at least 2 other friends with improv chops to join in.

I feel like it should be clearly advertised more that this is an improv game more than a party game. There's no real objection or goal. The ending is decided whenever the players feel like it. It's heavily up to you and your friends to move a story along by deciding what the evidence means for yourself and the scenario you made. Definitely can be loads of fun with the right people, but if you're expecting something similar to a Jackbox game, you won't really be getting that.

Jamison Brown here, before I discovered this court game, I was struggling to find direction and purpose. Life felt a bit stagnant, and I didn’t have a real outlet for my energy or emotions. But everything changed the day I opened the game. From the very first game, I felt something shift. The rhythm, the strategy, the competition—it all spoke to me in a way nothing else had. It challenged me physically and mentally, pushing me beyond my limits and showing me what I was truly capable of. What started as just a way to pass the time quickly became my passion and my therapy. This game taught me discipline, resilience, and teamwork. I learned how to lead, how to listen, and how to trust—not just my teammates, but myself. It helped me develop confidence I never knew I had and brought me into a community of people who share that same fire. Now, it’s more than a game to me. It’s a lifestyle, a mindset, and a constant reminder of how far I’ve come. I’ve grown not only as an athlete but as a person. I’m healthier, happier, and more focused in all areas of my life. If you’re looking for something that can truly transform you—physically, mentally, and emotionally—Guilty as Socks! just might be it. It certainly was for me.

For as it is I don't recommend this game to those that aim to play with a small group. Played it with 2 friends meeting the minimum of 3 players and it was fun to figure out and get a first trial going but without any context or prompts to guide us along to some entertaining improv, it felt empty and eventually too hard to come up with something on the fly. I am an actor and appreciate the setting to make an funny back and forth argument or even just having fun with the court room setting. I really think that the game could use some exposition or pre structure to start the trial/case somewhere that be lead into more to build off of, perhaps even adding a feature of the witnesses' having dialog to play off of when you call them to the stand.

Funny as hell with the right group of people. It can get pretty wild and stupid. 10/10

Absolutely love this game, me and my tabletop buds play this in our free time and it's a blast i only wish there was a bit more modulation, like it'd be nice to be able to increase the amount of times the Journalist could post news or if there was a way to add multiple custom evidence decks to be able to have more options in a game or if even there was some more pointless things to do other than throw the paper around like even if we could play with the pencils other than in the notebook or even more emotes to play around with would be great. Otherwise this game is a ton of fun and I cannot wait to see what gets added in updates to come.

this game is really fun and you dont just have to play with friends its reallly fun with randoms too

I'm only negative voting this game because there isn't a "meh" button, plus I, along with my entire friend group of 8 people, refunded it. The game is fun for about an hour, afterwards your group just kinda realizes that there really isn't much to do and that half of the roles are just there to be there. The game struggles at being a game. You create the defendant as the prosecutor, then the judge just kinda has you go back and forth until they make their decision, which ultimately means nothing. The other 5 or so people just kind of sit and watch as the main 3 have to come up with an entire skit themselves. There's like these cards that the prosecution and defense can use in order to try to spice up the argument, but again it doesn't really DO anything. The jurors just sit there all game, and suggest either guilty or innocent, but the judge could just as easily not listen to them. There is a bailiff who's job is to sit there and mute people......a witness who goes on the stand for a few minutes but again...doesn't really do much else, a journalist who's job is to draw for the entire game. Overall the game is just non-existent. It's a fun idea, but with it being so heavily focused on player creation, it doesn't really do what I think it's meant to do. This really is a hard sell to make negative, because of how cheap it is, and like I said, you can get like an hour or so of fun. But because I already know none of my friends will come back to play this, and that we all refunded it, sadly this game is guilty. I will say, I never played the.....matchmaking (for lack of better terms). So who knows, maybe that's somehow where the bread and butter of the game actually is. But because I know the internet, I highly doubt that. I would suggest that this game, similar to any of those lethal company/among us games, it is necessary to have a friend group, a funny one specifically.

The idea is pretty fun, but there's not much in the way of a game here. It's kind of just a chatroom that tells you to do a trial. You could more or less accomplish everything this game does just using Discord.

This game is really a hoot if you can get into a good group. Friends obviously make it better, but honestly the premise I think self-selects really damn well. Probably the funniest "friendslop" (hate that term) game in a long while.

it was fun and i liked it. im so crusty aauuuugh 8/10 solid gaming for gamey gamers.

Game is so fun, I play like I'm the greatest attorney of all time.

This game is absolute cinema. Please actually buy it the idea is pretty creative and its chaos and i like it!

It's been several updates and they still can't add an option to remap the scroll wheel. As someone without a scroll wheel, this renders the game unplayable to me.

"this game isnt game" it just a talk show that you can put a card into. This game have no objective. just bluff each other to surrender. and other support-role is too useless. I know if you want to roleplay it wont useless but why witness have to be 1 into 2 roles and why we cant play asaccused. I want that game have some little more objective like fake-envidence. and I want to make baliliff and journalist more usefull. baliliff is just trolling other and while journalist is just a artist in court. But... atleast I found my way to custom the game by using custom evidence system to make gameplay different... and then as I say the other role except judge, arttoney and prosecutor is too useless and I dont know how to let my friend play those role without boring. yeah judge is kinda boring to play too but atleast is just boring less than the other useless role This game is kinda have potential to be a good one of party game just make it have objective for every roles you have in this game. and maybe..maybe a custome rule I think? I dont know will develop read this but I like this game yeah I highly recommend if you guys have enemy best friend to bluff with... and yeah you will be boring after next three games. okay last now... maybe more gamemode and roles will be so interest and yeah I see that have other map in game why wont you add a theme for it like theme gamemode or theme evidence. thank you for read this and enjoy the game.

Perdí un Juicio en donde presenté pruebas de cómo volcaron mi carro, fui un burro y Claudia Sheinbaum en el mismo jucio, invente un amorío siendo periodista 10/10,

The game just isn't very fun. There some moments where it is quite funny, but most of the time it is an imbalance of trolling or of people taking the game way to serious. The game needs less freedom and more direction for the players. Even when I played with 5 of my friends it still failed to keep us entertained. The evidence and atmosphere of the game puts a lot of pressure on the defense and prosecution while every other side role is more so a spectator. The game is good, just needs more direction.

Great game if you have the right friends and is super funny depending on the people so if you can get some of your other friends to get it and play together

Fire ass game, so basically, being a sock in a courtroom is fucking hilarious and making up court cases is even funnier. Play this game, Im not asking.

Funny Game, Cheap too. If you ever wanted to see a court case about epstein and the islands turn into talking more about P. Diddy then the actual case, just for someone with the twin towers Pfp to make a news report about the judge's ass. This game is for you.

Game is a hilariously good time! I only played 2 games, and I'm itching to play more with friends. Fully recommend for anyone who enjoys dashes of improv, coercion, and silliness! Custom decks enhance the experience to custom suit your group's sensibilities, or otherwise. I'm very excited for future updates/content. 9/10 easily (providing you have friends or are willing to find a group).

This game is awesome and fun to play with friends!! And you can even find some really cool people! Have fun and just be stupid in court!

I think this game is amazing I love the custom cases you can make and not gonna lie I almost ALWAYS start laughing at some part of the match I highly recommend it and just every part of the game is good (in my opinion :P) Ps: The voice chat is really good because you don't have to type 24/7

this game is really funny sometimes and i just love you can write and say what ever you want

This game is the kind of thing my friends and I thrive on. If you like goofy role playing, argument games and a barrel of laughs, get some friends and play this game. You'll get what you put into it.